by Eva Wiland
November 24th, 2009 | SustainabilityAge
Tags: Andrew Robb, Australian Greens, Christine Milne, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, emissions trading scheme, Federal Opposition, Ian Macfarlane, Rudd Government, Senator Bob Brown
The leadership of the Federal Opposition has endorsed a compromise emissions trading scheme unveiled by the Rudd Government this morning but is still facing strong opposition in the party-room.
According to Reuters, the Rudd Government’s revised scheme still remains far from certain while opposition parties remain deeply divided and some conservatives vow to vote against the laws regardless of the deal and some moving to delay the vote until February 2010′.
In a bid to secure the Opposition’s vital support, the Rudd Government put forward a compromise carbon-trading scheme which boosts compensation to big carbon emitters, coal companies and electricity generators while reducing the incentives to households.
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said the additional expenditure measures would increase the cost by $7.01bn to 2019-20, while the household package will be reduced by $5.76bn.
The Australian Greens will oppose the scheme. During the debate in the Senate this morning, the Greens continued to criticise the Rudd Government and slammed the compromise scheme as a ‘dirty deal with dirty polluters’.
Green senator Christine Milne accused the Rudd Government for selling out. “It is payday for polluters today,” she said. “There is no commitment to 350 parts a million or getting rid of coal…(in fact) there is a determination to lock in coal till 2020.”
Australian Greens Leader, Senator Bob Brown said in the lead-up to the Senate debate: “The Rudd Government’s targets have failure written all over them. Yet the ETS legislation will lock them in until 2020 since any increase will trigger compensation claims worth billions of dollars.”
Ian Macfarlane, chief Opposition negotiator, said today the amendments to the scheme would help protect Australian jobs.
“We have got a very good package and I think we have an exceptional package. It’s a deal that will protect jobs and the environment in Australia,” he said this morning.
But the opposition’s former climate change spokesman, Andrew Robb, is understood to have told his colleagues the deal should not be supported, The Sydney Morning Herald reports.
Further reading:
Grass-root action against pollution lobby
Details of proposed CPRS changes
Read the story in The Sydney Morning Herald
by Eva Wiland
November 15th, 2009 | SustainabilityAge
Tags: climate change, climate-sceptics, Copenhagen, emissions trading scheme, GetUp, Kevin Rudd, Lowy Institute, Mal Washer, Malcolm Turbull, National Farmers Federation, Nick Minchin, polluters, pollution, pollution lobby, Senate leader
As Parliament resumes the debate on the emissions trading scheme this week, a grass-roots movement, claiming to represent ‘everyday Australians’, is behind a full-page advertisement to appear in The Australian newspaper tomorrow, aimed to counter fearmongering by what it calls the ‘pollution lobby’.
The Rudd government, which was elected on a policy platform which included action on climate change, has proposed the introduction of a carbon trading scheme from mid-2011 in an effort to curb emissions, but laws for the scheme have stalled in the Senate.
GetUp, describing itself as ‘an independent, grass-roots community advocacy organisation’, is asking supporters for donations to pay for the ad which says 500,000 jobs are waiting to be ‘unlocked’ by the ETS.
The group says the ‘pollution lobby’ acting for the country’s biggest polluters are swamping parliament with over 100 lobbyists. It accuses the lobby for undermining Australia’s transition to a clean-energy economy and ’strong-arming’ politicians into giving them extra tax-payer funded handouts.
The Opposition is hopelessly divided on the issue, putting any meaningful action by the Australian Government on climate change at risk and leaving the possibility open for a double dissolution of Parliament.
In a deja vue of when he led the republic movement, Opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull is plagued by a polorised flock. Ian MacFarlane, Opposition spokesman on emissions trading, is in despair over the National Party’s refusal to agree on any ETS, contrary to the National Farmers Federation which has been urging the Opposition to support it.
Any deal on a trading scheme now needs majority support of the Liberal MPs, who themselves are divided between those supporting action on climate change and those who believe it is a left-wing myth as revealed at ABC’s Four Corners program last week by Senate leader Nick Minchin.
One Liberal frontbencher was cited in The Australian, saying Senator Minchin ‘came across as a complete fruit loop’, while Western Australia Liberal Mal Washer said the senator ‘wouldn’t have a clue’ about what most Liberals thought about the issue of man-made climate change.
The government, which needs seven more votes to pass the scheme, is in talks with the opposition over amendments and according to The Sun-Herald of today, it has signalled preparedness to exempt farmers from the ETS in the hope this will enable the laws to pass before the Copenhagen summit.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd lashed out at the climate sceptics in his address to the Lowy Institute in Sydney, warning vested interests were hampering global action against climate change at the Copenhagen climate summit.
‘They are a minority. They are powerful, and invariably they are driven by vested interests,’ Rudd said. ‘They are powerful enough to threaten a deal on global climate change both in Copenhagen and beyond.
‘Their aim is to erode just enough political will that action becomes impossible. By hampering decisive action at a national level, they aim to make it impossible at an international level.’
The Opposition wants a vote delayed until after Copenhagen. Rudd said negotiations were continuing in good faith, but slammed the Opposition for delaying its final position seven times since late 2007.
‘It is an endless cycle of delay, and I am sure that with December almost upon us, the eighth excuse cannot be far away, which will be to wait until the next year or the year after until all the rest of the world has acted,’ Rudd said.
Further Reading:
Read the Four Corners transcript
Read The Australian story
Read The Sun-Herald story